An introduction to corner patterns, especially but not only meant for kyu players.
I'm afraid that this episode of Gentle Joseki is going to be a bit shorter compared to the previous ones. You'll surely understand that I cannot ignore my family all the time and that I have to get from behind my PC to join the festivities. However, before carrying on with the usual diagrams and semi-complete explanations I'd like to use this opportunity to tell you my idea of the do's and dont's for the 21st century. This is, after all, my only chance to do so. So,
I'm positive that the quality if your life will improve when following the above suggestions. Maybe you won't feel so immediately but I'm sure that in that case people around you will benefit which in the end will certainly reflect on yourself. __EOF; //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // PATTERNS // $cnt_patterns = array( array( 'type' => 'p' , 'text' => <<<__EOF Some of the aspects of the remaining moves in answer to the white approach knight's move, the keima kakari. The moves I haven't told you anything about yet are given in dia 1, A-E. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Various other ways to answer the keima kakari' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 1' , 'tag' => '001' , 'img' => array( array('001', 171, 171), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF I'm not a programmer myself but since I started trying to tell you something on an elementary level about joseki I can imagine what an extremely difficult task computer people undoubtedly are having figuring out a way to make up code covering all the necessary points, which seem to be virtually limitless. Every single edition of Gentle Joseki I desperately make a choice among the zillions of things, which are worthwhile telling you. When I finally put up the handful of diagrams here I feel often frustrated that I, again, wasn't able to show you more, my sincere apologizes for this. Looking through previous episodes of Gentle Joseki I realize that I did not spend nearly enough time, text and diagrams dealing with the already explained other possible black moves. I hope to get back to them in the future, someday. (Please don't go holding your breath.) __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Black plays sagari' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 2 & 2a' , 'tag' => '002' , 'img' => array( array('002', 190, 190), array('002a', 190, 190), ) , 'align' => 'vertical' , 'text' => <<<__EOF The move, which will not require too much explaining, is perhaps 1 in dia 2. On it's own it's maybe not a perfect move but you make about 9 points with two moves as shown by the triangles in the dia. If black has the time to add a move around A he will almost double that amount, this would be making optimal use of his stones, in other words, an ideal way of playing.
Now white can continue choosing among A-D in dia 2a. If
white plays A or B and starts something at the right
side black will, of course, solidify the upper side with
a move around C.
Neither the white move A nor B, however, is out trying
to make the black sagari look like a bad move. I white
insists on showing black that maybe his choice of
moves (= sagari "0") was not correct he'll play at C
or D after which there are, again, tens, hundreds of
variations unfortunately not given this time, sigh.
Please do not forget that the black sagari (descending move) 1 in dia 2 is not so popular when there is no black stone already somewhere at the upper side. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'A splendid move' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 3' , 'tag' => '003' , 'img' => array( array('003', 361, 361), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF Look closely at dia 3, here you can see a position where black 1 makes a splendid move. Of course instead of 1 a move at A instead is very possible, too. However, A has the drawback of leaving white the chance of invading at B. Black 1 is the tightest move possible and clearly goes for territory. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Various other ways to answer the keima kakari' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 4' , 'tag' => '004' , 'img' => array( array('004', 190, 190), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF The move 1 in dia 4 seems much in the same spirit as the black sagari we just had a look at.
Black 1 in dia 4, however, is hardly a move worth recommending when played with no friendly stones in the direct vicinity, preferably a stone at the left at a keima's distance. There is a painfully obvious peep at A which white in the future can use as a first move in a sequence going for the corner. There's nothing much black can do about keeping white out the corner. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'White invades' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 4a' , 'tag' => '004a' , 'img' => array( array('004a', 190, 190), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF In dia 4a you can see what most likely will happen if white directly enters the corner after black 3. Black, to be sure, can save face with the skillful tesuji of black 9 but one cannot help feeling that black is taken in a little. Prove of this is the exchange white 2-black 3. Imagine the situation without this exchange and you have a basic joseki. So after the basic joseki you can say that white played at 2 and that black, instead of fiercely pincering, the move dictate by fighting spirit, docile answered at 3. Although black 3 is of course not completely wasted it is a bit of slack move. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'p' , 'text' => <<<__EOF As often, however, in the case you feel your opponent has played a lesser move, it is advisable to not immediately try to show or prove your opponents move was a bad one. In the situation of dia 4a, for example, it might very well be a good idea for white to stay out of the corner for a while and let black worry about coming back there and play a defensive move.
The sagari, black 1, of dias 2 and 3 is on its own maybe not the best move possible but in many situations I don't think it will come out bad. Black 1 in dia 4 is just the other way around, unfortunately, on its own it's hard to make it in a good move. Black 1 is a typical "finishing touch" move. only played with plenty of back up around. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Ma Xiaochun versus Liu Xiaoguang, 11th Mingren title match, 1998' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 5' , 'tag' => '005' , 'img' => array( array('005', 361, 361), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF This is a fragment from a game between two top pros from China. Ma is White and Liu plays the black stones. In dia 5 white 1 is a nice tight move securing the corner territory while at the same time preparing huge endgame moves in regard to black's territory at the bottom __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Aiming an invasion' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 6' , 'tag' => '006' , 'img' => array( array('006', 228, 152), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF As you can see in dia 6 because of the position of white 1 he can next easily aim to invade at B, black cannot expect to capture or seriously attack this invasion. If white doesn't feel like invading (he could for example be afraid to lose the initiative (sente)) he might play the super slide of A, as you probably know called the "Large Monkey Jump", an excellent endgame move. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Greedy?' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 7' , 'tag' => '007' , 'img' => array( array('007', 190, 190), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF As with the black sagari (1 in dia 2) and the ikken-tobi one-space-jump (1 in dia 4) black 1 in dia 7 tries to secure the corner, too. This was for a long time one of my favorite moves when I was still playing tournaments in Holland, ages and ages ago. Many of my opponents not really had any clue about how to deal with this move and not a small number of them tried the most crazy things to prove that black 1 is just too greedy to be a correct move. Well, it certainly does look greedy, I guess, but is a perfectly common move and it does secure a large chunk of the corner
Let's have a look at a peaceful continuation after black 1, for example this could happen (dia 8). __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Joseki' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 8' , 'tag' => '008' , 'img' => array( array('008', 190, 209), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF Dia 8. This is a joseki, or, a sequence of moves, which gives both players a results they can live with. Black 1 in dia 7, however, has some unexpected features: __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Move of a madman?' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 9' , 'tag' => '009' , 'img' => array( array('009', 190, 209), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF Black 2 might look like the move of a madman but it's really quite fancy. White 3 is about the worst thing he can do. Without second thoughts black'll let go of one stone in order to create an impressive formation up to 8. White has not gotten much in return and if white isn't careful black will next play at A and white even won't even be able to make two eyes locally. This is a result very much to black's liking. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => "White's tesuji's" , 'foot' => 'Diagram 10' , 'tag' => '010' , 'img' => array( array('010', 190, 209), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF White's best move is at 1 in dia 10. This is a sharp tesuji, however, if white were to continue with 5 the result is again very nice for black. White should play a second tesuji, at A, instead of 5. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Black is low' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 11 & 11a' , 'tag' => '011' , 'img' => array( array('011', 190, 361), array('011a', 190, 361), ) , 'align' => 'horizontal' , 'text' => <<<__EOF When playing white I don't like the blocking move (= 1 in dia 8) very much. Black 1 is in a rather low position, the best move black often has to continue is at 3, another low move. So nothing to be worried about. In general it is a good attitude and often a necessary way of playing to just ignore your opponent's move. This is especially easy if your opponent's move was is in a rather low position. In dia 11 black 1 and 3 are not in an optimal position, compare dia 11a.
In dia 11a black's 1 and 3 are used in a more efficient way, creating a thick position, this result is superior to black's result in dia 11. Thinking about the difference between the dia's 11 and 11a you might want to try a playing elsewhere with white yourself. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Ignoring black' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 12' , 'tag' => '012' , 'img' => array( array('012', 209, 152), ) , 'text' => <<<__EOF So, just because black [] is a low position trying something else than just blocking at A is sometimes called for. In dia 12 white 1 is another move possible and 'kind of ignoring black []. White gets a nice shape at the upper side and black has some profit and thickness towards the lower right. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Whaaaat?!' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 13 & 14' , 'tag' => '013' , 'img' => array( array('013', 152, 152), array('014', 152, 152), ) , 'align' => 'vertical' , 'text' => <<<__EOF The kosumi-tsuke (diagonal clamp) is the last move I'm going to tell about this time. "Whaaaat?!" I hear you say, "But you promised to go over *all* the remaining possible moves!" I hear you say again. Yes, yes, you're quite right, I can do nothing but admit it and make a new promise: in Gentle Joseki 5 I promise to *only* talk about the remaining move, the clamp of dia 14 this move is certainly worth a lot of attention. __EOF ), array( 'type' => 'd' , 'head' => 'Unorthodox' , 'foot' => 'Diagram 15' , 'tag' => '015' , 'img' => array( array('015', 171, 209), ) , 'align' => 'vertical' , 'text' => <<<__EOF Well, for now, back to dia 13. This move on its own is a rather unorthodox play for a good reason: it solidifies the white stone and does not protect the corner properly.
Dia 15 shows a sequence which is most definitely not a
joseki, the result favors white. The only reason I can
think of for black to play this way is that after white
4 black intends to immediately play at B. A black play
at B guards against the white invasion at A and is a
very, very, very big move. It is also, however, a bit
slow. Usually black'll be too busy in the opening stage
of the game elsewhere to be able to permit himself such
a, mostly defensive, move.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'd'
, 'head' => 'Superb move'
, 'foot' => 'Diagram 16'
, 'tag' => '016'
, 'img' => array(
array('016', 171, 209),
)
, 'align' => 'vertical'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Dia 16 shows a typical situation where black 1 is a
superb move. Because of the presence of black [] white
has only little room to make something resembling a
group with eyes. To put it more bluntly: if white would
play as in dia 16 next a black move at A, B or C is
severe and white'll have to struggle for his life. This
is, by the way, a joseki which you can try to initiate
in a handicap game where black often has a stone at []
already. Do not expect, however, that white'll tamely
play at 4 in a feebly attempt to create eyes. Any white
player with a little talent will play elsewhere or
pincer two spaces below [] instead of 4, in a handicap
game, that is.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'd'
, 'head' => 'Preventing that white settles'
, 'foot' => 'Diagram 17'
, 'tag' => '017'
, 'img' => array(
array('017', 171, 209),
)
, 'align' => 'vertical'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
So why exactly is black 1 in dia 16 such a good
strategy you ask? Well, in dia 17 you can see what
happens if black omits the kosumi-tsuke and plays the
one-space-jump instead. White has way less trouble
settling himself with, for example, the sequence up to
4 in the dia. Instead of white 2 he might also try the
variation of clamping at A, next black 3 and white B.
In an even game this way of playing is often too thin
for white but in a handicap game where black often will
start doing funny things in any situation smelling of a
ko fight white might very well try it.
So why on earth would I start telling you about the
kosumi-tsuke of dia 13 when there's not even a pincer
stone present of black?
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'd'
, 'head' => 'Sonoda 8p (black) versus Shimamura 9p, 1977, black wins by 3.5'
, 'foot' => 'Diagram 18'
, 'tag' => '018'
, 'img' => array(
array('018', 361, 361),
)
, 'align' => 'vertical'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
The reason is the obscure joseki shown in dia 18. Do not
try to imitate this style of playing blindly, black's
usually has a hard time of making his stones come out
nicely once he plays at 1. In the dia, however, I think
that the result shows that black 1 in combination with
3 is very playable. Note the cool reinforcing move of
black 9, after this move white has no choice but to
defend against the threat of black pushing through
and cutting. White 10 is a stylish way of keeping his
stones connected but all the same, it feels black nicely
forced white into a joseki which white never thought
even existed. There is also plenty of chance white will
fumble somewhere along the line, but of course, we are
not counting on that, aye?
To finish the joseki, by the way, black usually jumps
out at A next. You might want to play like dia 18 if
you feel that you ought to play a pincer instead of
black 1 but are worried about the possible difficult
variations which might follow. There is not much room
for variation with the joseki in dia 18 and black gets
to play a pincer and is happy.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'd'
, 'head' => 'Okubo Yukio 6p (black) versus Go Seigen 9p, 1956, white wins by 2'
, 'foot' => 'Diagram 19'
, 'tag' => '019'
, 'img' => array(
array('019', 361, 361),
)
, 'align' => 'vertical'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Go Seigen is white against promising young player Okubo
in 1956. In spite of a 2 point reverse komi, black was
not able to win against the most talked about player of
the 20th century. Perhaps black 2 does not work well
against he who virtually made up one new joseki per game
during the first half of his career.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'p'
, 'head' => ''
, 'foot' => ''
, 'tag' => ''
, 'align' => 'vertical'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Be sure to come back next month for the next episode of
"Gentle Joseki"
__EOF
),
);
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// INDEX
//
$cnt_index = array(
array( 'type' => 'i'
, 'tag' => '002'
, 'img' => array(array('idx-01', 152, 152),)
),
array( 'type' => 'i'
, 'tag' => '004'
, 'img' => array(array('idx-02', 152, 152),)
),
array( 'type' => 'i'
, 'tag' => '007'
, 'img' => array(array('idx-03', 152, 152),)
),
array( 'type' => 'i'
, 'tag' => '013'
, 'img' => array(array('idx-04', 152, 152),)
),
array( 'type' => 'i'
, 'tag' => '013'
, 'img' => array(array('idx-05', 152, 152),)
),
);
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// NAMES (no names)
//
$cnt_names = array(
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Go Seigen'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
(1914-)
Japanese reading of his Chinese name
Wu Qing-yuan.
The unrivaled go genius of the 20th century. Although he is
approaching 90 now professionals like
O Rissei
and (until she moved to Korea)
Rui Naiwei
still recognize his genius and attend study sessions at Go's
house in Tokyo. For more about Go Seigen read
Mindzine.
Go is, by the way, a family name.
This, very appropriately, makes people address him as "Mr. Go",
or "Go Sensei" (lit. "Go Master") in Japanese.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Liu'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Family name,
Liu Xiaoguang
(1960-) Chinese top 9 dan, Beijin
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Ma'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Family name,
Ma Xiaochun
(1964-) Chinese top 9 dan for a long time top rooky, Beijin
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Okubo'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Family name,
Okubo Ichigen
(1929- )
Now a veteran 9 dan of the nihon ki-in of Tokyo. In 1956
he was a up-and-coming talent. I actually played a few 3
stone games with him at an Insei study trip, just after
I had arrived in Japan. Okubo is a very relaxed teacher
and extremely kind. After I hadn't seen him for a while
I met him again some time ago. When asked I had to admit
that I had quit trying to be a go pro. His reaction:
"That was the best thing for you to do. The life of a
go pro is by no means something to look forward to. I'm
sure that the ideal way of doing something with go is
strictly as a hobby"?
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Shimamura'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Family name,
Shimamura Toshihiro
(1912-1991)
Shimamura was for a couple of decades the pride of the
Nagoya branch of the nihon ki-in. He was one of the very
few who could hold his own against the Tokyo top pros
(among which Go Seigen and the like). He even managed to
lay hands on the NHK-Cup title, the Tengen title and the
Oza title. Among his pupils are Hane 9 dan and Yamashiro 9 dan.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'Sonoda'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
Family name,
Sonoda Yuichi
(1952-)
A colorful 9 dan from the Kansai ki-In in Osaka. He
has a very free spirited style sometimes resembling
Takemiya's "Cosmic Style".
__EOF
),
);
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// TERMS
//
$cnt_glossary = array(
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'aji'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
taste; remaining possibilities, however distant they may be
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'atari'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
"check" on at least 1 stone
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'dan'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
ranking system for stronger players
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'fuseki'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
opening
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'gote'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
not being able to leave the current situation first,
allowing your opponent to be able the play elsewhere first
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'hoshi'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
star; any of the 9 dots one the go board,
the middle one is called "Tengen" (=center/origin of heaven).
Hoshi is often used when talking about an opening move
on the 4-4 point.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'joseki'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
a sequence of moves (in the corner) giving both players
a locally equal results
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'kakari'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
approach move to the corner
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'kikashi'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
a move which is almost impossible to ignore, also "forcing move"
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'ko'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
situation which occurs when it is possible to
immediately re-capture the stone your opponent played
in the previous move to capture 1 of your stones. Since
there is no end to this there is the ko-rule, which
prohibits a player to exactly recreate a previous board
position.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'komi'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
compensation for white (usually 5-7 points) since black
gets to play the first move. (often there is a half
point komi, as in 5.5 stones komi, to prevent a game
from ending in a draw)
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'komoku'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
the 4-3 point
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'kori-gatachi'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
inefficient shape, uneconomical, using to many stones
to make only few points (hollow wall)
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'kyu'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
rating system used for intermediate players
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'miai'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
of equal value
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'moyo'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
large framework often forcing the opponent to (try to)
reduce it drastically in order to stay in the game
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'ni-ren-sei'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
two 4-4 moves one the same side of the board
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'ponnuki'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
the name of the shape when 4 stones capture one enemy stone
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'san-ren-sei'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
3 hoshi of the same color at the same side of the board
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'sente'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
having the opportunity to play elsewhere first leaving
the current situation. (example: he had sente so he
decided to play tenuki)
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'shimari'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
"closing" (the corner) formation, any 2 moves which effectively
seal the corner, also "enclosure".
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'shin-fuseki'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
"New Opening" a way of playing starting in the 1930's
which does not accept the go-theory of the 19 century as
being without its weak points.
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'tatami'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
thick mats of woven rush stuffed with straw, traditional flooring
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'tenuki'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
playing else first when judging the current situation
does not require an immediate follow up
__EOF
),
array( 'type' => 'n'
, 'name' => 'warui'
, 'text' => <<<__EOF
bad
__EOF
),
);
?>
( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: doc_info in /var/www/gobase.org/studying/articles/mioch/joseki/index.phtml on line 33 Call Stack # Time Memory Function Location 1 0.0001 357368 {main}( ) .../index.phtml:0
( ! ) Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/gobase.org/studying/articles/mioch/joseki/index.phtml on line 33 Call Stack # Time Memory Function Location 1 0.0001 357368 {main}( ) .../index.phtml:0
|
An introduction to corner patterns, especially but not only meant for kyu players.
| |
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
The Patterns | |
| ||
|
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||
| ||
|
Appendix 01 | |
| ||
|
Index of joseki's mentioned in this episode:
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||
| ||
|
Appendix 02 | |
| ||
|
Japanese words and their English equivalents used in this article: | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Copyright © Pieter Mioch | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||
|
home | index | about pieter mioch | part 1 |
|
| |||
|
home > studying > articles > pieter mioch > gentle joseki part |
Feedback: editor@gobase.org |
|